Editorial in Krenlandian Newspaper:
Krenland's steelmakers are losing domestic sales because of lower-priced imports, in many cases because foreign governments subsidize their steel industries in ways that are banned by international treaties. But whatever the cause, the cost is ultimately going to be jobs in Krenland's steel industry. Therefore, it would protect not only steel companies but also industrial employment in Krenland if our government took measures to reduce cheap steel imports.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial's argument?
请问张慧雯老师,逻辑链:P(条件):低价进口影响了K国钢铁企业的销售量,进而影响钢铁行业就业 C(结果):减少低价进口不仅能保护K国钢铁企业还能保护K国工业就业。E: K国钢铁工人的工资与出国口工人工资差异很大。这里的错误是不是在于他只说了差异大,但是哪里工资高哪里工资低我们不知道,如果K国工资比国外还高一点呢?所以E选项不选。本题c选项: K国很多面临严峻国内国际竞争的制造商,钢材在其原材料成本中占据非常大的比重。那这个选项和是否限制进口有什么关系呢?谈的是原材料比例的问题,有点绕不过来,然后请老师看看我E选项排除的原因对不对。