In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting lobsters from the territorial waters of the country of Belukia.  Soon after, the annual tonnage of lobster legally harvested in Belukian waters began declining; in 1996, despite there being no reduction in the level of legal lobster fishing activity, the local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels.  It is therefore highly likely that the outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster illegally that year.  Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting lobsters from the territorial waters of the country of Belukia. Soon after, the annual tonnage of lobster legally harvested in Belukian waters began declining; in 1996, despite there being no reduction in the level of legal lobster fishing activity, the local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels. It is therefore highly likely that the outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster illegally that year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A、The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of catchable lobsters in Belukia's territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996.
B、The average annual lobster catch, in tons, of an outlaw fishing boat has increased steadily since 1992.
C、Outlaw fishing boats do not, as a group, harvest more lobsters than do licensed lobster-fishing boats.
D、The annual legal lobster harvest in Belukia in 1996 was not significantly less than 9,000 tons.
E、A significant proportion of Belukia's operators of licensed lobster-fishing boats went out of business between 1992 and 1996.

专业教师答疑

问题：请问tina老师，您说的取非是什么意思？查看答疑

问题：请Tina老师回答谢谢！！A选项中说illegal harvesting规模不大因为龙虾数量整体减少，感觉像是削弱文章结论，因为非法捕捞也无法捞到9000吨的龙虾，不理解为什么可以成为assumption 查看答疑

问题：题目是assumption，那正确答案不是应该在原文的reason后结论前做为一个可以提升原文结论可信程度的逻辑补充吗？请问一下英吉老师选项A是如何补充逻辑链的。谢谢！查看答疑

问题：老师，我错选C,可以讲解一下这道题吗，这道题不是假设题吗？为什么我听其他几条答疑都感觉像是weaken题呢？查看答疑

问题：请郭培月老师回答(⁎⁍̴̛ᴗ⁍̴̛⁎)谢谢~ 请问老师我这样考虑A选项是否正确：取非，非法捕太多导致可捕的总量大幅度下降了。可是我认为这样只能说合法的减少不完全是因为非法捕太多，也是因为可捕总量少了，对原文逻辑链并不能100%推翻。。这道题怎么排除BCD选项？另外其实我也不懂为什么原文说合法的减少的9000吨就是非法捕的，不知道原文是怎么推出来的。。所以做这道题很懵~ 谢谢老师回答(˶‾᷄ ⁻̫ ‾᷅˵) 查看答疑

问题：错选了D 查看答疑

问题：A/D 查看答疑

问题：原文的字面意思读得懂，但是不理解It is therefore 后面的内容和前面什么关系做题的时候也没有多想读选项 A说的是非法捕鱼没有导致龙虾数量下降 B每船捕鱼量再涨（无关） C合法不予和非法捕鱼数量比较 D合法捕鱼量不少于 E有的倒闭了（无关）觉得肯定无关只能排除BE ACD不知道该怎么样考虑了谢谢老师！查看答疑

问题：读选项后就排除了C/D/E B选项说的是自从1992年开始每条船非法捕龙虾的在稳定增加，觉得和原文沾边就留下了...而A选项觉得不是很明白最后就还是选择了B觉得与文章关系更直接...听了之前答疑的录音也还是不明白，是因为什么原因最终把B排除的...希望管老师指点查看答疑

扫我提问哦！